rnk marked an inline comment as done.
rnk added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/clang/Sema/DeclSpec.h:1240
+ /// in the prototype. These are generally tag types or enumerators.
+ unsigned NumDeclsInPrototype : 8;
+
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> It seems plausible that generated code could have more than 256 such
> declarations. This class has a pointer, a set of bit-fields, 12 `unsigned`s,
> and another pointer, so we could give this a full 32 bits without increasing
> the size of the class. Alternatively we could share the storage with
> `NumExceptions`, since this can only be non-zero in C and that can only be
> non-zero in C++.
I did it as a union with the EH machinery initially, but it changes our
behavior on this test case:
void f(struct Foo {} o) {} // error in C++
struct Foo {}; // follow on error for redefining type Foo
We actually have test cases for this at
clang/test/SemaCXX/type-definition-in-specifier.cpp. I don't think it's
important to preserve that exact behavior, though, so performance may be more
important. I just did it this way to avoid premature optimization.
================
Comment at: test/Misc/ast-dump-decl.c:109-110
// CHECK: FunctionDecl{{.*}} TestFunctionDecl 'int (int, enum {{.*}})'
-// CHECK-NEXT: EnumDecl
-// CHECK-NEXT: EnumConstantDecl{{.*}} e
// CHECK-NEXT: ParmVarDecl{{.*}} x
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> Why is this not here any more? Looks like SemaDecl.cpp:8255 should have added
> it to this `DeclContext`. It'd be nice for `-ast-dump` to still dump these
> declarations somewhere.
I changed things to dump non-parameter decls in the function now, but we only
move NamedDecls into the function DeclContext, so the output is a little
different. Think it matters?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27279
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
