topperc wrote: > Unless `lld/test/ELF` tests will get a failure, the `lld/` part should > ideally be dropped from this PR. This separation is a convention. > > Otherwise (a) with just a `[RISCV]` tag and (b) with many RISCV-specific > changes, lld folks (like I) might not notice this patch.
Are you saying that lld changes should be a different PR? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77414 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
