rogfer01 added inline comments.

================
Comment at: test/libcxx/strings/iterators.exceptions.pass.cpp:29
+#ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
+constexpr bool expected = false;
+#else
----------------
EricWF wrote:
> We can't use constexpr because these tests run in C++03. However `const bool 
> expected = ...` should give you a value you can use in constant expressions.
Ah, I was confused by the usage of C++11 headers in this file but I will use a 
`static const bool` instead. Thanks.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D27310



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to