banach-space wrote:

> > How does this compare to GFortran and Classic Flang? Anything resembling 
> > this flag?
> 
> GFortran does not have it, but Classic Flang does. So, it's closing a gap to 
> Classic Flang here as well.

Do you know the meaning for Classic Flang? Would be great to make "LLVM Flang" 
consistent with any "prior art". Nice to have ;-)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90886
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to