banach-space wrote: > > How does this compare to GFortran and Classic Flang? Anything resembling > > this flag? > > GFortran does not have it, but Classic Flang does. So, it's closing a gap to > Classic Flang here as well.
Do you know the meaning for Classic Flang? Would be great to make "LLVM Flang" consistent with any "prior art". Nice to have ;-) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90886 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits