ahatanak added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D27304#610944, @thegameg wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D27304#610697, @joerg wrote: > > > I think this is the absolutely wrong place to put such logic. It really can > > not be anywhere but the backend. > > > I am aware of this. But the way the backend informs the Diagnostics looks > like a crash, and asks for a bug report. > > Are there any proper ways to inform the frontend about backend errors? Instead of checking the return type in SemaChecking.cpp, is defining a virtual function in TargetInfo and overriding it in X86TargetInfo an option? https://reviews.llvm.org/D27304 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
