================
@@ -350,6 +350,13 @@ class ResultObjectVisitor : public
RecursiveASTVisitor<ResultObjectVisitor> {
return RecursiveASTVisitor<ResultObjectVisitor>::TraverseDecl(D);
}
+ bool TraverseDecltypeTypeLoc(DecltypeTypeLoc Node) {
----------------
Xazax-hun wrote:
> It also turns out that, even though the operand of the noexcept operator in
> an unevaluated operand, it still shows up in the CFG for some reason
This surprises me, I can't think of a reason why we would want to have it in
the CFG. This keyword appeards a lot in generic code, so maybe excluding it
from the CFG might have measurable perf/memory benefits. I'd think it might be
worth to give this a try and see if something breaks (in a separate PR).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90438
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
