alexfh accepted this revision.
alexfh added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LG with a comment.
================
Comment at: include/clang/Tooling/DiagnosticsYaml.h:79
+ for (auto &Diagnostic : Doc.Diagnostics) {
+ if (Diagnostic.Fix.size() > 0) {
+ Diagnostics.push_back(Diagnostic);
----------------
Alpha wrote:
> alexfh wrote:
> > Should we copy all diagnostics instead?
> I am not sure about that. Copying all diagnostics will mean having empty
> entries in the replacement files with just a check name. This might seem
> useless, the problem being that at the moment, the only useful exported
> information in diagnostics are the replacements. I think that if all
> diagnostics are copied, it must be done in a different patch, with a proper
> export of all the meaningful information about the diagnostics.
> Then, the exported info in clang-tidy will not solely be fixes, but every
> diagnostic info (which could mean changing the name and meaning of output
> file and option). What is your feeling about this?
Please add a FIXME to MappingTraits<clang::tooling::Diagnostic>::mapping to
properly export locations, messages, notes, diagnostic levels and all other
fields. And a FIXME here to export all diagnostics, not just the ones with
fixes.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26137
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
