MaskRay wrote: > FYI I'm seeing about 0.6% compile-time regressions for `O0` test-suite builds > with this change > ([llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=ef2ca97f48f1aee1483f0c29de5ba52979bec454&to=18376810f359dbd39d2a0aa0ddfc0f7f50eac199&stat=instructions:u](https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=ef2ca97f48f1aee1483f0c29de5ba52979bec454&to=18376810f359dbd39d2a0aa0ddfc0f7f50eac199&stat=instructions:u)). > Though there is also a 4.5% reduction in text size > ([llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=ef2ca97f48f1aee1483f0c29de5ba52979bec454&to=18376810f359dbd39d2a0aa0ddfc0f7f50eac199&stat=size-text](https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=ef2ca97f48f1aee1483f0c29de5ba52979bec454&to=18376810f359dbd39d2a0aa0ddfc0f7f50eac199&stat=size-text)) > so maybe the tradeoff is reasonable even for `O0`.
Thanks for the numbers! It's my understanding that the increase in .text size outweighs the assembly time benefit of -mrelax-all... (A trick to remove one iteration in the branch displacement (span-dependent instruction) algorithm). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90013 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
