cor3ntin wrote:

I think it makes sense to go with this patch and let target maintainers tweak 
the value subsequently.
It seems that trying to not provide a value unless explicitly specified by the 
target would be worse for library vendors as
`hardware_destructive_interference_size` is specified to exist unconditionally. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89446
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to