cor3ntin wrote: I think it makes sense to go with this patch and let target maintainers tweak the value subsequently. It seems that trying to not provide a value unless explicitly specified by the target would be worse for library vendors as `hardware_destructive_interference_size` is specified to exist unconditionally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89446 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits