Xazax-hun wrote: > It's unfortunate that the enum syntax is so bulky (the need for `Stmt::` and > the `Class` suffix).
Once we can use C++20, it could get a bit better thanks to https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/enum#Using-enum-declaration. > I'm making this a non-draft PR and will add @Xazax-hun for an additional > opinion. I also don't have a strong opinion; I am fine with both styles. That being said, if C++ gets proper pattern matching in the future, the switch might be easier to refactor. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88865 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
