AaronBallman wrote: > You're missing checks for type domain rules, so things like: > > * converting between `float _Complex` and `double _Complex` > > * common type of `float _Complex` and `double` > > * result of `int` and `float _Complex` > > * complex types not allowed in increment/decrement operators > > * complex types permitted in unary +, -
Thanks for the suggestions, these are now being tested. > Not sure how to test this, but _Complex float not promoting to _Complex > double like float does to double is also worth slotting under complex > conformance. Also 6.7.8p10 (static-storage duration arithmetic types (which > include complex types) are initialized to 0). I'll add tests for these as well. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88161 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
