https://github.com/jhuber6 commented:
Seems somewhat superfluous to me. I'm wondering if what this customer wants to do is more easily serviced by `#if __has_builtin(...)` or `#if __has_feature(...)`. However I definitely agree that our feature detection macros are a bit of a mess. I'm not privy to the naming methodology here, presumably future generations will not be called `CDNAx` so wouldn't be then have some special case code for one family that doesn't expose any extra information? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88293 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
