================
@@ -1230,11 +1230,26 @@ CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXForRangeStmt(const
CXXForRangeStmt &S,
JumpDest LoopExit = getJumpDestInCurrentScope("for.end");
LexicalScope ForScope(*this, S.getSourceRange());
+ const DeclStmt *RangeDS = cast<DeclStmt>(S.getRangeStmt());
+ const VarDecl *RangeVar = cast<VarDecl>(RangeDS->getSingleDecl());
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus23)
----------------
efriedma-quic wrote:
It makes sense that the extra ExprWithCleanups would force the destructor to
run early, since that's supposed to be the marker for a full-expression.
Do we actually need to handle this case? Looking at the current standard, it
says "A temporary expression bound to a reference member from a default member
initializer is ill-formed", which would seem to imply we should reject any case
that would require this sort of lifetime extension.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86960
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
