================
@@ -661,6 +680,10 @@ namespace dr553 {
}
// dr554: na
+
+// dr555: na
----------------
Endilll wrote:
I added a proper test for 555. Basically, I copied 466 test, and derived
reference tests from it. In 466, I derived a test for non-pointer and
non-reference scalar types.
> Finally, there is no place in the Standard that describes the lookup for
> pseudo-destructor calls of the form p->T::~T() and r.T::~T(), where p and r
> are a pointer and reference to scalar, respectively.
As we agreed offline, I'm testing just this sentence from 555, as that's the
only actionable thing there for us.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87909
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
