fhahn created this revision. fhahn added reviewers: rengolin, silvas. fhahn added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
x86 is not a valid arch for target triples, but x86_64 and i386 are. https://reviews.llvm.org/D26960 Files: docs/CrossCompilation.rst Index: docs/CrossCompilation.rst =================================================================== --- docs/CrossCompilation.rst +++ docs/CrossCompilation.rst @@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ on when assembling or linking. The triple has the general format ``<arch><sub>-<vendor>-<sys>-<abi>``, where: - * ``arch`` = ``x86``, ``arm``, ``thumb``, ``mips``, etc. + * ``arch`` = ``x86_64``, ``i386``, ``arm``, ``thumb``, ``mips``, etc. * ``sub`` = for ex. on ARM: ``v5``, ``v6m``, ``v7a``, ``v7m``, etc. * ``vendor`` = ``pc``, ``apple``, ``nvidia``, ``ibm``, etc. * ``sys`` = ``none``, ``linux``, ``win32``, ``darwin``, ``cuda``, etc. * ``abi`` = ``eabi``, ``gnu``, ``android``, ``macho``, ``elf``, etc. The sub-architecture options are available for their own architectures, -of course, so "x86v7a" doesn't make sense. The vendor needs to be +of course, so "x86v7a" doesn't make sense. The vendor needs to be specified only if there's a relevant change, for instance between PC and Apple. Most of the time it can be omitted (and Unknown) will be assumed, which sets the defaults for the specified architecture.
Index: docs/CrossCompilation.rst =================================================================== --- docs/CrossCompilation.rst +++ docs/CrossCompilation.rst @@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ on when assembling or linking. The triple has the general format ``<arch><sub>-<vendor>-<sys>-<abi>``, where: - * ``arch`` = ``x86``, ``arm``, ``thumb``, ``mips``, etc. + * ``arch`` = ``x86_64``, ``i386``, ``arm``, ``thumb``, ``mips``, etc. * ``sub`` = for ex. on ARM: ``v5``, ``v6m``, ``v7a``, ``v7m``, etc. * ``vendor`` = ``pc``, ``apple``, ``nvidia``, ``ibm``, etc. * ``sys`` = ``none``, ``linux``, ``win32``, ``darwin``, ``cuda``, etc. * ``abi`` = ``eabi``, ``gnu``, ``android``, ``macho``, ``elf``, etc. The sub-architecture options are available for their own architectures, -of course, so "x86v7a" doesn't make sense. The vendor needs to be +of course, so "x86v7a" doesn't make sense. The vendor needs to be specified only if there's a relevant change, for instance between PC and Apple. Most of the time it can be omitted (and Unknown) will be assumed, which sets the defaults for the specified architecture.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
