llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Axel Lundberg (Zonotora)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
Fix since #<!-- -->75481 got reverted.
- Explicitly set BitfieldBits to 0 to avoid uninitialized field member for the
integer checks:
```diff
- llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt8Ty(), Check.first)};
+ llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt8Ty(), Check.first),
+ llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt32Ty(), 0)};
```
- `Value **Previous` was erroneously `Value *Previous` in
`CodeGenFunction::EmitWithOriginalRHSBitfieldAssignment`, fixed now.
- Assert instead of check:
```diff
- if (Kind == CK_IntegralCast) {
+ assert(Kind == CK_IntegralCast || Kind == CK_LValueToRValue &&
+ "Should be either CK_IntegralCast or CK_LValueToRValue");
```
CK_LValueToRValue when going from, e.g., char to char, and CK_IntegralCast
otherwise.
- Make sure that `Value *Previous = nullptr;` is initialized (see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1189e87951e59a81ee097eae847c06008276fef1)
- Add another extensive testcase
`ubsan/TestCases/ImplicitConversion/bitfield-conversion.c`
---
Patch is 72.25 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761.diff
12 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+7)
- (modified) clang/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.rst (+14-5)
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/Sanitizers.def (+10-10)
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp (+35-2)
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp (+230-34)
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h (+15)
- (added) clang/test/CodeGen/ubsan-bitfield-conversion.c (+61)
- (added) clang/test/CodeGenCXX/ubsan-bitfield-conversion.cpp (+94)
- (modified) clang/test/Driver/fsanitize.c (+14-14)
- (modified) compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp (+17-10)
- (modified) compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.h (+1)
- (added)
compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/ImplicitConversion/bitfield-conversion.c
(+641)
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 28e8ddb3c41c3e9..abf15c8dc49d9e7 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ Non-comprehensive list of changes in this release
New Compiler Flags
------------------
+- ``-fsanitize=implicit-bitfield-conversion`` checks implicit truncation and
+ sign change.
+- ``-fsanitize=implicit-integer-conversion`` a group that replaces the previous
+ group ``-fsanitize=implicit-conversion``.
- ``-Wmissing-designated-field-initializers``, grouped under
``-Wmissing-field-initializers``.
This diagnostic can be disabled to make ``-Wmissing-field-initializers``
behave
@@ -211,6 +215,9 @@ Modified Compiler Flags
- Added a new diagnostic flag ``-Wreturn-mismatch`` which is grouped under
``-Wreturn-type``, and moved some of the diagnostics previously controlled by
``-Wreturn-type`` under this new flag. Fixes #GH72116.
+- ``-fsanitize=implicit-conversion`` is now a group for both
+ ``-fsanitize=implicit-integer-conversion`` and
+ ``-fsanitize=implicit-bitfield-conversion``.
- Added ``-Wcast-function-type-mismatch`` under the ``-Wcast-function-type``
warning group. Moved the diagnostic previously controlled by
diff --git a/clang/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.rst
b/clang/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.rst
index 8f58c92bd2a1634..531d56e313826c7 100644
--- a/clang/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.rst
@@ -148,6 +148,11 @@ Available checks are:
Issues caught by this sanitizer are not undefined behavior,
but are often unintentional.
- ``-fsanitize=integer-divide-by-zero``: Integer division by zero.
+ - ``-fsanitize=implicit-bitfield-conversion``: Implicit conversion from
+ integer of larger bit width to smaller bitfield, if that results in data
+ loss. This includes unsigned/signed truncations and sign changes,
similarly
+ to how the ``-fsanitize=implicit-integer-conversion`` group works, but
+ explicitly for bitfields.
- ``-fsanitize=nonnull-attribute``: Passing null pointer as a function
parameter which is declared to never be null.
- ``-fsanitize=null``: Use of a null pointer or creation of a null
@@ -193,8 +198,8 @@ Available checks are:
signed division overflow (``INT_MIN/-1``). Note that checks are still
added even when ``-fwrapv`` is enabled. This sanitizer does not check for
lossy implicit conversions performed before the computation (see
- ``-fsanitize=implicit-conversion``). Both of these two issues are handled
- by ``-fsanitize=implicit-conversion`` group of checks.
+ ``-fsanitize=implicit-integer-conversion``). Both of these two issues are
handled
+ by ``-fsanitize=implicit-integer-conversion`` group of checks.
- ``-fsanitize=unreachable``: If control flow reaches an unreachable
program point.
- ``-fsanitize=unsigned-integer-overflow``: Unsigned integer overflow, where
@@ -202,7 +207,7 @@ Available checks are:
type. Unlike signed integer overflow, this is not undefined behavior, but
it is often unintentional. This sanitizer does not check for lossy
implicit
conversions performed before such a computation
- (see ``-fsanitize=implicit-conversion``).
+ (see ``-fsanitize=implicit-integer-conversion``).
- ``-fsanitize=vla-bound``: A variable-length array whose bound
does not evaluate to a positive value.
- ``-fsanitize=vptr``: Use of an object whose vptr indicates that it is of
@@ -224,11 +229,15 @@ You can also use the following check groups:
- ``-fsanitize=implicit-integer-arithmetic-value-change``: Catches implicit
conversions that change the arithmetic value of the integer. Enables
``implicit-signed-integer-truncation`` and
``implicit-integer-sign-change``.
- - ``-fsanitize=implicit-conversion``: Checks for suspicious
- behavior of implicit conversions. Enables
+ - ``-fsanitize=implicit-integer-conversion``: Checks for suspicious
+ behavior of implicit integer conversions. Enables
``implicit-unsigned-integer-truncation``,
``implicit-signed-integer-truncation``, and
``implicit-integer-sign-change``.
+ - ``-fsanitize=implicit-conversion``: Checks for suspicious
+ behavior of implicit conversions. Enables
+ ``implicit-integer-conversion``, and
+ ``implicit-bitfield-conversion``.
- ``-fsanitize=integer``: Checks for undefined or suspicious integer
behavior (e.g. unsigned integer overflow).
Enables ``signed-integer-overflow``, ``unsigned-integer-overflow``,
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/Sanitizers.def
b/clang/include/clang/Basic/Sanitizers.def
index c2137e3f61f6450..b228ffd07ee7454 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/Sanitizers.def
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/Sanitizers.def
@@ -163,24 +163,24 @@
SANITIZER_GROUP("implicit-integer-arithmetic-value-change",
ImplicitIntegerArithmeticValueChange,
ImplicitIntegerSignChange | ImplicitSignedIntegerTruncation)
-SANITIZER("objc-cast", ObjCCast)
+SANITIZER_GROUP("implicit-integer-conversion", ImplicitIntegerConversion,
+ ImplicitIntegerArithmeticValueChange |
+ ImplicitUnsignedIntegerTruncation)
-// FIXME:
-//SANITIZER_GROUP("implicit-integer-conversion", ImplicitIntegerConversion,
-// ImplicitIntegerArithmeticValueChange |
-// ImplicitUnsignedIntegerTruncation)
-//SANITIZER_GROUP("implicit-conversion", ImplicitConversion,
-// ImplicitIntegerConversion)
+// Implicit bitfield sanitizers
+SANITIZER("implicit-bitfield-conversion", ImplicitBitfieldConversion)
SANITIZER_GROUP("implicit-conversion", ImplicitConversion,
- ImplicitIntegerArithmeticValueChange |
- ImplicitUnsignedIntegerTruncation)
+ ImplicitIntegerConversion |
+ ImplicitBitfieldConversion)
SANITIZER_GROUP("integer", Integer,
- ImplicitConversion | IntegerDivideByZero | Shift |
+ ImplicitIntegerConversion | IntegerDivideByZero | Shift |
SignedIntegerOverflow | UnsignedIntegerOverflow |
UnsignedShiftBase)
+SANITIZER("objc-cast", ObjCCast)
+
SANITIZER("local-bounds", LocalBounds)
SANITIZER_GROUP("bounds", Bounds, ArrayBounds | LocalBounds)
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
index 54432353e7420d1..02dc2cfce00d820 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
@@ -5580,11 +5580,44 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBinaryOperatorLValue(const
BinaryOperator *E) {
break;
}
- RValue RV = EmitAnyExpr(E->getRHS());
+ // TODO: Can we de-duplicate this code with the corresponding code in
+ // CGExprScalar, similar to the way EmitCompoundAssignmentLValue works?
+ RValue RV;
+ llvm::Value *Previous = nullptr;
+ QualType SrcType = E->getRHS()->getType();
+ // Check if LHS is a bitfield, if RHS contains an implicit cast expression
+ // we want to extract that value and potentially (if the bitfield sanitizer
+ // is enabled) use it to check for an implicit conversion.
+ if (E->getLHS()->refersToBitField()) {
+ llvm::Value *RHS =
+ EmitWithOriginalRHSBitfieldAssignment(E, &Previous, &SrcType);
+ RV = RValue::get(RHS);
+ } else
+ RV = EmitAnyExpr(E->getRHS());
+
LValue LV = EmitCheckedLValue(E->getLHS(), TCK_Store);
+
if (RV.isScalar())
EmitNullabilityCheck(LV, RV.getScalarVal(), E->getExprLoc());
- EmitStoreThroughLValue(RV, LV);
+
+ if (LV.isBitField()) {
+ llvm::Value *Result = nullptr;
+ // If bitfield sanitizers are enabled we want to use the result
+ // to check whether a truncation or sign change has occurred.
+ if (SanOpts.has(SanitizerKind::ImplicitBitfieldConversion))
+ EmitStoreThroughBitfieldLValue(RV, LV, &Result);
+ else
+ EmitStoreThroughBitfieldLValue(RV, LV);
+
+ // If the expression contained an implicit conversion, make sure
+ // to use the value before the scalar conversion.
+ llvm::Value *Src = Previous ? Previous : RV.getScalarVal();
+ QualType DstType = E->getLHS()->getType();
+ EmitBitfieldConversionCheck(Src, SrcType, Result, DstType,
+ LV.getBitFieldInfo(), E->getExprLoc());
+ } else
+ EmitStoreThroughLValue(RV, LV);
+
if (getLangOpts().OpenMP)
CGM.getOpenMPRuntime().checkAndEmitLastprivateConditional(*this,
E->getLHS());
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
index 397b4977acc3e9d..b6bae4f83247244 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include "CGDebugInfo.h"
#include "CGObjCRuntime.h"
#include "CGOpenMPRuntime.h"
+#include "CGRecordLayout.h"
#include "CodeGenFunction.h"
#include "CodeGenModule.h"
#include "ConstantEmitter.h"
@@ -308,6 +309,7 @@ class ScalarExprEmitter
llvm::Type *DstTy, SourceLocation Loc);
/// Known implicit conversion check kinds.
+ /// This is used for bitfield conversion checks as well.
/// Keep in sync with the enum of the same name in ubsan_handlers.h
enum ImplicitConversionCheckKind : unsigned char {
ICCK_IntegerTruncation = 0, // Legacy, was only used by clang 7.
@@ -1098,11 +1100,28 @@ void
ScalarExprEmitter::EmitIntegerTruncationCheck(Value *Src, QualType SrcType,
llvm::Constant *StaticArgs[] = {
CGF.EmitCheckSourceLocation(Loc), CGF.EmitCheckTypeDescriptor(SrcType),
CGF.EmitCheckTypeDescriptor(DstType),
- llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt8Ty(), Check.first)};
+ llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt8Ty(), Check.first),
+ llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt32Ty(), 0)};
+
CGF.EmitCheck(Check.second, SanitizerHandler::ImplicitConversion, StaticArgs,
{Src, Dst});
}
+static llvm::Value *EmitIsNegativeTestHelper(Value *V, QualType VType,
+ const char *Name,
+ CGBuilderTy &Builder) {
+ bool VSigned = VType->isSignedIntegerOrEnumerationType();
+ llvm::Type *VTy = V->getType();
+ if (!VSigned) {
+ // If the value is unsigned, then it is never negative.
+ return llvm::ConstantInt::getFalse(VTy->getContext());
+ }
+ llvm::Constant *Zero = llvm::ConstantInt::get(VTy, 0);
+ return Builder.CreateICmp(llvm::ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT, V, Zero,
+ llvm::Twine(Name) + "." + V->getName() +
+ ".negativitycheck");
+}
+
// Should be called within CodeGenFunction::SanitizerScope RAII scope.
// Returns 'i1 false' when the conversion Src -> Dst changed the sign.
static std::pair<ScalarExprEmitter::ImplicitConversionCheckKind,
@@ -1127,30 +1146,12 @@ EmitIntegerSignChangeCheckHelper(Value *Src, QualType
SrcType, Value *Dst,
assert(((SrcBits != DstBits) || (SrcSigned != DstSigned)) &&
"either the widths should be different, or the signednesses.");
- // NOTE: zero value is considered to be non-negative.
- auto EmitIsNegativeTest = [&Builder](Value *V, QualType VType,
- const char *Name) -> Value * {
- // Is this value a signed type?
- bool VSigned = VType->isSignedIntegerOrEnumerationType();
- llvm::Type *VTy = V->getType();
- if (!VSigned) {
- // If the value is unsigned, then it is never negative.
- // FIXME: can we encounter non-scalar VTy here?
- return llvm::ConstantInt::getFalse(VTy->getContext());
- }
- // Get the zero of the same type with which we will be comparing.
- llvm::Constant *Zero = llvm::ConstantInt::get(VTy, 0);
- // %V.isnegative = icmp slt %V, 0
- // I.e is %V *strictly* less than zero, does it have negative value?
- return Builder.CreateICmp(llvm::ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT, V, Zero,
- llvm::Twine(Name) + "." + V->getName() +
- ".negativitycheck");
- };
-
// 1. Was the old Value negative?
- llvm::Value *SrcIsNegative = EmitIsNegativeTest(Src, SrcType, "src");
+ llvm::Value *SrcIsNegative =
+ EmitIsNegativeTestHelper(Src, SrcType, "src", Builder);
// 2. Is the new Value negative?
- llvm::Value *DstIsNegative = EmitIsNegativeTest(Dst, DstType, "dst");
+ llvm::Value *DstIsNegative =
+ EmitIsNegativeTestHelper(Dst, DstType, "dst", Builder);
// 3. Now, was the 'negativity status' preserved during the conversion?
// NOTE: conversion from negative to zero is considered to change the
sign.
// (We want to get 'false' when the conversion changed the sign)
@@ -1239,12 +1240,143 @@ void
ScalarExprEmitter::EmitIntegerSignChangeCheck(Value *Src, QualType SrcType,
llvm::Constant *StaticArgs[] = {
CGF.EmitCheckSourceLocation(Loc), CGF.EmitCheckTypeDescriptor(SrcType),
CGF.EmitCheckTypeDescriptor(DstType),
- llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt8Ty(), CheckKind)};
+ llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt8Ty(), CheckKind),
+ llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt32Ty(), 0)};
// EmitCheck() will 'and' all the checks together.
CGF.EmitCheck(Checks, SanitizerHandler::ImplicitConversion, StaticArgs,
{Src, Dst});
}
+// Should be called within CodeGenFunction::SanitizerScope RAII scope.
+// Returns 'i1 false' when the truncation Src -> Dst was lossy.
+static std::pair<ScalarExprEmitter::ImplicitConversionCheckKind,
+ std::pair<llvm::Value *, SanitizerMask>>
+EmitBitfieldTruncationCheckHelper(Value *Src, QualType SrcType, Value *Dst,
+ QualType DstType, CGBuilderTy &Builder) {
+ bool SrcSigned = SrcType->isSignedIntegerOrEnumerationType();
+ bool DstSigned = DstType->isSignedIntegerOrEnumerationType();
+
+ ScalarExprEmitter::ImplicitConversionCheckKind Kind;
+ if (!SrcSigned && !DstSigned)
+ Kind = ScalarExprEmitter::ICCK_UnsignedIntegerTruncation;
+ else
+ Kind = ScalarExprEmitter::ICCK_SignedIntegerTruncation;
+
+ llvm::Value *Check = nullptr;
+ // 1. Extend the truncated value back to the same width as the Src.
+ Check = Builder.CreateIntCast(Dst, Src->getType(), DstSigned, "bf.anyext");
+ // 2. Equality-compare with the original source value
+ Check = Builder.CreateICmpEQ(Check, Src, "bf.truncheck");
+ // If the comparison result is 'i1 false', then the truncation was lossy.
+
+ return std::make_pair(
+ Kind, std::make_pair(Check, SanitizerKind::ImplicitBitfieldConversion));
+}
+
+// Should be called within CodeGenFunction::SanitizerScope RAII scope.
+// Returns 'i1 false' when the conversion Src -> Dst changed the sign.
+static std::pair<ScalarExprEmitter::ImplicitConversionCheckKind,
+ std::pair<llvm::Value *, SanitizerMask>>
+EmitBitfieldSignChangeCheckHelper(Value *Src, QualType SrcType, Value *Dst,
+ QualType DstType, CGBuilderTy &Builder) {
+ // 1. Was the old Value negative?
+ llvm::Value *SrcIsNegative =
+ EmitIsNegativeTestHelper(Src, SrcType, "bf.src", Builder);
+ // 2. Is the new Value negative?
+ llvm::Value *DstIsNegative =
+ EmitIsNegativeTestHelper(Dst, DstType, "bf.dst", Builder);
+ // 3. Now, was the 'negativity status' preserved during the conversion?
+ // NOTE: conversion from negative to zero is considered to change the
sign.
+ // (We want to get 'false' when the conversion changed the sign)
+ // So we should just equality-compare the negativity statuses.
+ llvm::Value *Check = nullptr;
+ Check =
+ Builder.CreateICmpEQ(SrcIsNegative, DstIsNegative, "bf.signchangecheck");
+ // If the comparison result is 'false', then the conversion changed the sign.
+ return std::make_pair(
+ ScalarExprEmitter::ICCK_IntegerSignChange,
+ std::make_pair(Check, SanitizerKind::ImplicitBitfieldConversion));
+}
+
+void CodeGenFunction::EmitBitfieldConversionCheck(Value *Src, QualType SrcType,
+ Value *Dst, QualType DstType,
+ const CGBitFieldInfo &Info,
+ SourceLocation Loc) {
+
+ if (!SanOpts.has(SanitizerKind::ImplicitBitfieldConversion))
+ return;
+
+ // We only care about int->int conversions here.
+ // We ignore conversions to/from pointer and/or bool.
+ if (!PromotionIsPotentiallyEligibleForImplicitIntegerConversionCheck(SrcType,
+
DstType))
+ return;
+
+ if (DstType->isBooleanType() || SrcType->isBooleanType())
+ return;
+
+ // This should be truncation of integral types.
+ assert(isa<llvm::IntegerType>(Src->getType()) &&
+ isa<llvm::IntegerType>(Dst->getType()) && "non-integer llvm type");
+
+ // TODO: Calculate src width to avoid emitting code
+ // for unecessary cases.
+ unsigned SrcBits = ConvertType(SrcType)->getScalarSizeInBits();
+ unsigned DstBits = Info.Size;
+
+ bool SrcSigned = SrcType->isSignedIntegerOrEnumerationType();
+ bool DstSigned = DstType->isSignedIntegerOrEnumerationType();
+
+ CodeGenFunction::SanitizerScope SanScope(this);
+
+ std::pair<ScalarExprEmitter::ImplicitConversionCheckKind,
+ std::pair<llvm::Value *, SanitizerMask>>
+ Check;
+
+ // Truncation
+ bool EmitTruncation = DstBits < SrcBits;
+ // If Dst is signed and Src unsigned, we want to be more specific
+ // about the CheckKind we emit, in this case we want to emit
+ // ICCK_SignedIntegerTruncationOrSignChange.
+ bool EmitTruncationFromUnsignedToSigned =
+ EmitTruncation && DstSigned && !SrcSigned;
+ // Sign change
+ bool SameTypeSameSize = SrcSigned == DstSigned && SrcBits == DstBits;
+ bool BothUnsigned = !SrcSigned && !DstSigned;
+ bool LargerSigned = (DstBits > SrcBits) && DstSigned;
+ // We can avoid emitting sign change checks in some obvious cases
+ // 1. If Src and Dst have the same signedness and size
+ // 2. If both are unsigned sign check is unecessary!
+ // 3. If Dst is signed and bigger than Src, either
+ // sign-extension or zero-extension will make sure
+ // the sign remains.
+ bool EmitSignChange = !SameTypeSameSize && !BothUnsigned && !LargerSigned;
+
+ if (EmitTruncation)
+ Check =
+ EmitBitfieldTruncationCheckHelper(Src, SrcType, Dst, DstType, Builder);
+ else if (EmitSignChange) {
+ assert(((SrcBits != DstBits) || (SrcSigned != DstSigned)) &&
+ "either the widths should be different, or the signednesses.");
+ Check =
+ EmitBitfieldSignChangeCheckHelper(Src, SrcType, Dst, DstType, Builder);
+ } else
+ return;
+
+ ScalarExprEmitter::ImplicitConversionCheckKind CheckKind = Check.first;
+ if (EmitTruncationFromUnsignedToSigned)
+ CheckKind = ScalarExprEmitter::ICCK_SignedIntegerTruncationOrSignChange;
+
+ llvm::Constant *StaticArgs[] = {
+ EmitCheckSourceLocation(Loc), EmitCheckTypeDescriptor(SrcType),
+ EmitCheckTypeDescriptor(DstType),
+ llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt8Ty(), CheckKind),
+ llvm::ConstantInt::get(Builder.getInt32Ty(), Info.Size)};
+
+ EmitCheck(Check.second, SanitizerHandler::ImplicitConversion, StaticArgs,
+ {Src, Dst});
+}
+
Value *ScalarExprEmitter::EmitScalarCast(Value *Src, QualType SrcType,
QualType DstType, llvm::Type *SrcTy,
llvm::Type *DstTy,
@@ -2620,6 +2752,8 @@ ScalarExprEmitter::EmitScalarPrePostIncDec(const
UnaryOperator *E, LValue LV,
llvm::PHINode *atomicPHI = nullptr;
llvm::Value *value;
llvm::Value *input;
+ llvm::Value *Previous = nullptr;
+ QualType SrcType = E->getType();
int amount = (isInc ? 1 : -1);
bool isSubtraction = !isInc;
@@ -2708,7 +2842,8 @@ ScalarExprEmitter::EmitScalarPrePostIncDec(const
UnaryOperator *E, LValue LV,
"base or promoted) will be signed, or the bitwidths will match.");
}
if (CGF.SanOpts.hasOneOf(
- SanitizerKind::ImplicitIntegerArithmeticValueChange) &&
+ SanitizerKind::ImplicitIntegerArithmeticValueChange |
+ SanitizerKind::ImplicitBitfieldConversion) &&
canPerformLossyDemotionCh...
[truncated]
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
