alexey-bataev wrote:

> I haven't removed any code logic or made alterations that would affect these 
> AFAIK. I'm not sure however if these were supported in the first place. If 
> @alexey-bataev has any tests for them then I could try them out before and 
> after the patch and post an update here.

I don't remember exactly the test (added them more than 5 years ago), but both 
UDR and non-trivial constructors should be supported. I just remember that 
there were some limitations for UDR for NVPTX, like trivial UDR operations to 
use NVPTX fast builtins. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80343
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to