================ @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat -Wformat-signedness %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-win32 -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat -Wformat-signedness %s + +// Verify that -Wformat-signedness alone (without -Wformat) trigger the +// warnings. Note in gcc this will not trigger the signedness warnings as +// -Wformat is default off in gcc. +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat-signedness %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-win32 -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat-signedness %s + +// Verify that -Wformat-signedness warnings are not reported with only -Wformat +// (gcc compat). +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -Wformat -Werror %s + +// Verify that -Wformat-signedness with -Wno-format are not reported (gcc compat). +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -Wformat-signedness -Wno-format -Werror %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -Wno-format -Wformat-signedness -Werror %s + +#include <limits.h> ---------------- AaronBallman wrote:
```suggestion ``` I think we should drop this include (avoids relying on finding the limits.h from Clang without passing `-ffreestanding` for the tests). Instead, we can use the predefined macros below. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
