topperc wrote: > > Apart from the correctness issues, we've seen some regressions on various > > benchmarks from LLVM Test Suite after this patch. Specifically, around 3-5% > > regression on x86-64 in various metrics of the > > [Interpolation](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-test-suite/tree/main/MicroBenchmarks/ImageProcessing/Interpolation) > > benchmarks, and up to 30% regression on a number of floating point-centric > > benchmarks from > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-test-suite/tree/main/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc > > (flops-4.c, flops-5.c, flops-6.c, flops-8.c, fp-convert.c). The numbers > > vary depending on the microarchitecture, with Skylake being less affected > > (on the order of ~10%) and AMD Rome showing larger regressions (up to 30%). > > FYI this patch saves ~3% instructions for some benchmarks from > LLVM-test-suite on RISC-V. > [dtcxzyw/llvm-ci#1115](https://github.com/dtcxzyw/llvm-ci/issues/1115) > [dtcxzyw/llvm-ci#1114](https://github.com/dtcxzyw/llvm-ci/issues/1114)
Are you able to extract a reproducer that I can look at? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82404 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
