mehdi_amini added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26649#595296, @phosek wrote:
> It's sufficient, I just tested it. I'm not actually sure if `LLVM_ENABLE_LLD` > here is correct, `LLVM_ENABLE_LLD` forces the use of lld, but lld might not > be available during first stage. We need `LLVM_ENABLE_LLD` to be set, but > only for the second stage (which is something that can be done in the cache > file), in the first stage we should probably just check whether lld source is > available and we're building it, but I'm not sure what's the easiest/cleanest > way to do that? `-DBOOTSTRAP_ LLVM_ENABLE_LLD` is the right way to check for stage-2 options. If you look just a few lines above your check you'll see an example of check for `BOOTSTRAP_LLVM_ENABLE_LTO` Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D26649 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
