topperc wrote: > > By the way, is there any plan to support `CFLUSH.I.L1` in the future? > > Flushing the instruction cache doesn't make sense given it can never be > dirty. Invalidating/discarding does, but that's just what fence.i is doing?
A cflush.i.l1 did appear in some SiFive manual at some point, but I don't think any hardware implements it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83896 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
