================
@@ -721,10 +722,17 @@ std::string 
PredefinedExpr::ComputeName(PredefinedIdentKind IK,
     return std::string(Out.str());
   }
   if (const FunctionDecl *FD = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(CurrentDecl)) {
-    if (IK != PredefinedIdentKind::PrettyFunction &&
-        IK != PredefinedIdentKind::PrettyFunctionNoVirtual &&
-        IK != PredefinedIdentKind::FuncSig &&
-        IK != PredefinedIdentKind::LFuncSig)
+    const auto &LO = Context.getLangOpts();
+    if ((ForceElaboratedPrinting &&
+         (((IK == PredefinedIdentKind::Func ||
+            IK == PredefinedIdentKind ::Function) &&
+           !LO.MicrosoftExt) ||
+          (IK == PredefinedIdentKind::LFunction && LO.MicrosoftExt))) ||
+        (!ForceElaboratedPrinting &&
+         (IK != PredefinedIdentKind::PrettyFunction &&
+          IK != PredefinedIdentKind::PrettyFunctionNoVirtual &&
+          IK != PredefinedIdentKind::FuncSig &&
+          IK != PredefinedIdentKind::LFuncSig)))
----------------
Sirraide wrote:

Er, this may just be a me problem, but this is candidly hitting the limits of 
what I’d consider legible in terms of nested conditions. Maybe there’s a way to 
write this that makes it more obvious what is actually going on here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84014
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to