Sirraide wrote: > But it sounds like my idea doesn't have legs because of OpenMP specification > requirements. I'm fine with (3) as an approach then.
I think a hybrid approach between (3) and what you’re suggesting might make sense: 1. Introduce `[[omp::assume]]` for OpenMP 2. Deprecate `[[clang::assume]]` and `__attribute__((assume))`, telling people to use `[[omp::assume]]` or `[[assume]]` instead, depending on where we encounter the attribute, and maybe, eventually 3. Change `__attribute__((assume))` (and `[[clang::assume]]` if we care enough about that one) to be synonyms for `[[assume]]`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81014 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
