mzyKi wrote: > Makes sense, but how did it build before the fix? I thought by inheriting > from `Checker` it would take the address of the member function with the > expected signature to store them inside vectors. How could it take the > address of a nonexisting member function? I think ```evalCall()``` is an independent function in CheckerDocumentation.cpp and it has no relation with ```Checker<eval::Call>```. If no problem, I will merge soon.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83677 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
