wlei-llvm wrote:

> > > LGTM. I'd also have a change that errors out on huge staleness go in 
> > > together with this one..
> > 
> > 
> > Was thinking to use a separate diff for that, feels non-trivial to do it, 
> > but I'm also good for doing in this.
> > Just pushed one version for this, it use heuristics to check this, note 
> > that the current threshold flags is just based my "gut feeling", so I'm 
> > going to tune those flags on our internal services, hope that we can 
> > achieve the goal:
> > 
> > 1. Use the current prod profile, so all build should pass without any false 
> > positives break.
> > 2. Use the incompatible profile, so all build should error out.
> > 
> > Any early feedback is appreciated.
> 
> Sorry I wasn't clear. The error out change should be a separate patch as 
> logically it's independent of the original mix order change. By go in 
> together, I was mostly thinking about two patches that go in together..

Oh, that's my initial thought too, Ok, I will create a new PR, and hold this 
until we can go in together. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75092
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to