nkakuev added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26418#590417, @malcolm.parsons wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26418#590383, @nkakuev wrote: > > > The warning is caused by a third-party code, but header filter won't help > > you to suppress it since it now relates to your sources. > > > The header filter suppresses the warning location, but the note locations are > in the main file so they unsuppress the warning. > > It sounds like you want note locations to be ignored. I want a convenient instrument to suppress unwanted diagnostics. Even if I change clang-tidy to ignore note locations, it would still be impractical to use '-header-filter' to //exclude// diagnostics from certain headers. Header filter was designed to //include// headers, not to //exclude// them. Trying to exclude "these m directories and that n files" is close to impossible using a single regular expression. Plus, even if I manage to do this, I'll be ignoring all diagnostics and not only the faulty ones. Suppress-check-filter is specifically designed to //exclude// headers and doesn't require abusing regular expressions to do this. Plus, it allows a user to specify what diagnostics he doesn't want, instead of ignoring everything. https://reviews.llvm.org/D26418 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
