================
@@ -193,7 +193,14 @@ Available checks are:
signed division overflow (``INT_MIN/-1``), but not checks for
lossy implicit conversions performed before the computation
(see ``-fsanitize=implicit-conversion``). Both of these two issues are
- handled by ``-fsanitize=implicit-conversion`` group of checks.
+ handled by ``-fsanitize=implicit-conversion`` group of checks. Note that
+ ``-fwrapv`` implicitly disables instrumentation for much of the arithmetic
+ covered by ``-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow``.
+ - ``-fsanitize=signed-integer-wrap``: Signed Integer wraparound, where the
----------------
JustinStitt wrote:
I agree that the current version is not so clear. I must admit, though, I am
not 100% sure what changes you would like. Vitaly, do you think it should be
worded like such:
```
Note that ``-fwrapv`` implicitly disables most checks performed by this
sanitizer
as the overflow behavior is well-defined.
```
If this doesn't match what you were thinking could you let me know?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80089
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
