llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis Author: None (martinboehme) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> We want to make it clear that the current behavior doesn't yet handle unions properly. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82239.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp (+1) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp b/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp index 513f22d8aa0f9c..fe13e919bddcd8 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp @@ -664,6 +664,7 @@ class TransferVisitor : public ConstStmtVisitor<TransferVisitor> { QualType Type = S->getType(); if (Type->isUnionType()) { + // FIXME: Initialize unions properly. if (auto *Val = Env.createValue(Type)) Env.setValue(*S, *Val); return; `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82239 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
