alexfh requested changes to this revision. alexfh added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25659#588658, @alexfh wrote: > I think, silently choosing one of the checks may be confusing and > counter-intuitive. Should we just warn in case we see the same check enabled > by multiple aliases? And by "aliases" I mean different names under which the check is registered. I'm not sure I see the benefit of introducing a separate concept and a separate API for registering checks under multiple names. This introduces another sort of dynamic binding, which we have to have good reasons for. https://reviews.llvm.org/D25659 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
