================
@@ -535,7 +535,19 @@ class TransferVisitor : public
ConstStmtVisitor<TransferVisitor> {
return;
copyRecord(*LocSrc, *LocDst, Env);
- Env.setStorageLocation(*S, *LocDst);
+
+ // If the expr is a glvalue, we can reasonably assume the operator is
+ // returning T& and thus we can assign it `LocDst`.
+ if (S->isGLValue()) {
+ Env.setStorageLocation(*S, *LocDst);
+ } else if (S->getType()->isRecordType()) {
+ // If the expr is a prvalue, we cannot really assume anything regarding
+ // the new value being created. We should just propagate it to ensure a
+ // `RecordValue` exist for it.
----------------
martinboehme wrote:
The "propagate" wording is misleading. Here's a suggestion based on the
equivalent code in `VisitCallExpr()`:
```suggestion
// Make sure that we have a `RecordValue` for this expression so that
// `Environment::getResultObjectLocation()` is able to return a location
// for it.
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80991
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
