dzhidzhoev wrote: > I see what you're saying about the metadata being incorrect; I feel like I've > seen it before, but can't pin it down. For the record, all the builds where > we saw this assertion were thin/full LTO. > > I've kicked off a reduction of a large reproducer that I have to hand; I'm > not immensely confident that it'll complete in a reasonable timescale (i.e.: > days) as it's a large project being reduced. If any of the other reporters > have anything smaller they can reduce, that'd assist significantly.
Thanks a lot! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75385 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
