AaronBallman wrote: > @AaronBallman > > > Do you see this crash with community clang and no downstream changes? > > Yes I can reproduce it with a vanila `clang` built from a git checkout at > this version, but the problem is extremely sensitive to the input headers, > their content and defines (`-Dbla`) in the compilation command.
Thank you, that's good to know you hit it with vanilla Clang! I think that between this information and the backtrace in #80127 we have enough of a reason to revert without a reproducer at hand. However, I think that if we don't have a reproducer by mid-next week (say 22:00 UTC on 2/7, but the date/time are negotiable) we should re-land the changes as-is to try to get more instances of the crash happening in the wild to help us solve the issue. WDYT? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66514 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
