================
@@ -228,6 +229,42 @@ void emit(Program &P, std::vector<std::byte> &Code, const
Floating &Val,
Val.serialize(Code.data() + ValPos);
}
+template <>
+void emit(Program &P, std::vector<std::byte> &Code,
+ const IntegralAP<false> &Val, bool &Success) {
+ size_t Size = Val.bytesToSerialize();
+
+ if (Code.size() + Size > std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max()) {
+ Success = false;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Access must be aligned!
+ size_t ValPos = align(Code.size());
+ Size = align(Size);
+ assert(aligned(ValPos + Size));
+ Code.resize(ValPos + Size);
+ Val.serialize(Code.data() + ValPos);
+}
+
+template <>
+void emit(Program &P, std::vector<std::byte> &Code, const IntegralAP<true>
&Val,
+ bool &Success) {
+ size_t Size = Val.bytesToSerialize();
+
+ if (Code.size() + Size > std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max()) {
+ Success = false;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Access must be aligned!
+ size_t ValPos = align(Code.size());
+ Size = align(Size);
+ assert(aligned(ValPos + Size));
+ Code.resize(ValPos + Size);
+ Val.serialize(Code.data() + ValPos);
+}
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Could we be overly clever and use an NTTP here so it's `const
IntegralAP<IsUnsigned>` or is that way too awkward given this is already in a
template specialization?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79747
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
