Hi Adtiya, I had to revert in r285485 to unbreak this build bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage2-configure-Rlto_build/10737/ <http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage2-configure-Rlto_build/10737/> (LTO bootstrap of clang).
Let’s iterate on the revision on Phabricator to figure out what it the right fix! Best, — Mehdi > On Oct 28, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Aditya Kumar via cfe-commits > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Author: hiraditya > Date: Fri Oct 28 16:27:24 2016 > New Revision: 285456 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=285456&view=rev > Log: > Added 'inline' attribute to basic_string's destructor > > Author: laxmansole > > Reviewers: howard.hinnant > mclow.lists > Subscribers: EricWF, flyingforyou, evandro > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25624 > > Reapplying the patch as the bug https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30341 > is fixed. > > Currently basic_string's destructor is not getting inlined. So adding > 'inline' attribute to ~basic_string(). > Worked in collaboration with Aditya Kumar. > > Modified: > libcxx/trunk/include/string > > Modified: libcxx/trunk/include/string > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/string?rev=285456&r1=285455&r2=285456&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- libcxx/trunk/include/string (original) > +++ libcxx/trunk/include/string Fri Oct 28 16:27:24 2016 > @@ -806,6 +806,7 @@ public: > basic_string(initializer_list<value_type> __il, const allocator_type& > __a); > #endif // _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_GENERALIZED_INITIALIZERS > > + inline _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY > ~basic_string(); > > _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits