================ @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ ; RUN: < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NOT-SUPPORTED ; RUN: not llc -mtriple powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu -ppc-asm-full-reg-names \ ; RUN: < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NOT-SUPPORTED +; RUN: not llc -mtriple powerpc64-ibm-aix-xcoff -ppc-asm-full-reg-names \ +; RUN: -data-sections=false < %s 2>&1 | \ +; RUN: FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NOT-SUPPORTED-NO-DATASEC ---------------- stefanp-ibm wrote:
nit: I realize that this is how things are done above but using CHECK-NOT-SOMETHING is really confusing. I had to wrap my brain around it and realize that this was indeed a CHECK and not a CHECK-NOT. How about `CHECK-UNSUPPORTED-NO-DATASEC` like the first test case. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79252 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
