minglotus-6 wrote: > I'm missing the full context behind this patch, but code seems reasonable
Thanks for the review! This patch is supposed to be self-contained as a fix, although it's spotted when I worked on relevant larger efforts ([type profiling](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-dynamic-type-profiling-and-optimizations-in-llvm/74600) and [better call graph](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-for-better-call-graph-sort-build-a-more-complete-call-graph-by-adding-more-indirect-call-edges/74029)) when trying to figure out how PGO names of functions work in the pipeline. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78610 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
