================
@@ -1071,6 +1071,16 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest,
UnderstandsRequiresClausesAndConcepts) {
"concept C = (!Foo<T>) && Bar;");
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 19u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[15], tok::ampamp, TT_BinaryOperator);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("void f() & requires(C<decltype(x)>) {}");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 18u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::amp, TT_PointerOrReference);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::kw_requires, TT_RequiresClause);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("auto f() -> int& requires(C<decltype(x)>) {}");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 20u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[6], tok::amp, TT_PointerOrReference);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[7], tok::kw_requires, TT_RequiresClause);
}
----------------
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
I have no problem with removing it. If you keep it, I would add a check for
`OpenAngles == 0`. The same applies to `||` because one could write something
like
```c++
requires (T<C1 || C2> t) {}
```
So the whole logic should only apply to the out of template area, similar to
`const`, `volatile`, and `comma` above.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78847
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
