Xazax-hun wrote:

> This has been pretty lengthy, but I hope it gives more context.

Yeah, this was really helpful, thanks! This makes a lot of sense to me, I agree 
that this is a facility that we need. On the other hand, I am still wondering 
whether it is a good idea to expose this publicly to the checks or whether we 
could do it more transparently. That being said, I think the "publicness" of 
this API is not that important to solve at this point. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78427
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to