SamTebbs33 wrote: > clang has never emitted diagnostics for failure to inline an always_inline > function. But if gcc is doing it, maybe defaulting to an error isn't such a > big deal.
clang does actually emit an error when it finds always_inline on a callee with different target attributes to the caller: https://godbolt.org/z/37Yz4oPjo > Separately, it's probably worth ensuring that the LLVM inlining passes don't > actually perform illegal inlining for functions marked always_inline; looking > at the code, it looks like we might end up skipping the relevant checks. The `TargetTransformInfo::areInlineCompatible` function in llvm makes these checks. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77936 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
