mjklemm wrote: > In a long run, I still think that we need to get rid of `Fortran_main`. > Perhaps, for the minimal, we can rename it to remove `Fortran` in the name to > make people think that it is not required (by the users) to do any linking > for Fortran code.
I'd agree to that! The way gfortran does it, seems the best approach. When there's a program unit in the code, gfortran also add a `main` definition to that translation unit. Unfortunately, my knowledge about flang internals is not yet there, so I have no clue how to get it to emit the equivalent of the `main` in libFortran_main. I could get away with having it in .ll file or something and pull it in from disk, but even that seems to exceed my current capabilities. :-) I could opt-in to make this a learning project for me, but I'd need some hand holding to get it done. Volunteers? :-) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78152 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
