================
@@ -437,6 +442,16 @@ namespace {
MostDerivedArraySize = 2;
MostDerivedPathLength = Entries.size();
}
+ void addVectorUnchecked(QualType EltTy, uint64_t Size, uint64_t Idx) {
+ Entries.push_back(PathEntry::ArrayIndex(Idx));
+
+ // This is technically a most-derived object, though in practice this
+ // is unlikely to matter.
+ MostDerivedType = EltTy;
+ MostDerivedIsArrayElement = true;
+ MostDerivedArraySize = Size;
----------------
sethp wrote:
I'm not sure about this: it seems to indicate that an expression like `&V[0]`
ought to be valid, but it's often not possible to take a pointer to a vector
element (i.e. when they're living in a vector register).
That said, I see it's what the `Complex` type is doing, and I whose elements I
think are also not individually addressable, so :shrug:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72607
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
