If we issue a fixit we should recover as-if the code was written with the fixit in. Does this code do that? (can we test it? I know we test some fixits - not sure it's necessary/worthwhile to test them all, but maybe we have a good idiom for testing that the recovery is correct)
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 6:47 AM Aaron Ballman <aaron.ball...@gmail.com> wrote: > aaron.ballman accepted this revision. > aaron.ballman added a reviewer: aaron.ballman. > aaron.ballman added a comment. > This revision is now accepted and ready to land. > > LGTM > > > > ================ > Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp:6287 > + Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(DestructedType, > + ObjectType->getPointeeType())) > { > + Diag(OpLoc, diag::err_typecheck_member_reference_suggestion) > ---------------- > You can elide the curly braces. > > > Repository: > rL LLVM > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D25817 > > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits