hanhanW wrote: > I am curious though, what do you mean by more powerful expand_shape op? > Wouldn't that just be exactly reshape? We don't need a more powerful > expand_shape to cover all the cases you mention above.
That could be tensor.reshape, but I don't see a scenario about using it. To be honest, I don't have an answer. Bailing out the case is fine to me. If someday people think it is needed, this will help bring up the discussion. To be clear, I am not saying that this is not useful. I just don't know why this is needed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76003 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits