hanhanW wrote:

> I am curious though, what do you mean by more powerful expand_shape op? 
> Wouldn't that just be exactly reshape? We don't need a more powerful 
> expand_shape to cover all the cases you mention above.

That could be tensor.reshape, but I don't see a scenario about using it. To be 
honest, I don't have an answer. Bailing out the case is fine to me. If someday 
people think it is needed, this will help bring up the discussion. To be clear, 
I am not saying that this is not useful. I just don't know why this is needed.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76003
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to