FreddyLeaf wrote: > > @RKSimon @phoebewang Thanks comments! knm has AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ, I guess we > > also require it work without avx512vl? And we are going to keep > > -march/mtune/mcpu support for knl/knm, but removing some specific ISA's > > intrinsic and lowering supports? Did I get your point wrong? > > That's correct - we keep -march/mtune/mcpu support for knl/knm but reduce its > feature set to avx512f/avx512cd and we don't provide any support for xeon-phi > specific features (avx512pf etc.) apart from the minimal binutils/assembly > handling necessary. > > If we keep support for VPOPCNTDQ on knm then yes we will need to allow > non-VLX handling, but I don't know much about general availability of knm > workstations (knl cpus/machines do turn up on ebay etc. quite frequently).
Thanks confirming! Modified the warning message and commit title. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75580 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
