apple-fcloutier wrote: [N2844](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2844.pdf), as linked by OP, references the removed language that you are looking for.
As Aaron said, it doesn't matter if clang never claimed conformance/never implemented default argument promotion for these types in the first place. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74439 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
