Fznamznon wrote:

@mikaelholmen , I see. I'll revert both patches to unblock you and I'll think 
about the proper solution after the holidays.
Perhaps there should be wider discussion whether we should emulate GCC behavior 
regarding silencing of these warnings.
IMO, the warnings you're seeing are correct, there is no initializer for field 
`b`. It is emulating of possible gcc bug that this patch breaks.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70829
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to