================
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// RUN: clang-repl "int x = 10;" "{ int t; a::b(t); }" "int y = 10;"
----------------
p4vook wrote:

I don't quite understand, the `code-undo.cpp` doesn't seem to have anything 
that produces an error, but this test does.
If we define a::b(t), clang-repl stops segfaulting.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75629
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to