================ @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +// RUN: clang-repl "int x = 10;" "{ int t; a::b(t); }" "int y = 10;" ---------------- p4vook wrote:
I don't quite understand, the `code-undo.cpp` doesn't seem to have anything that produces an error, but this test does. If we define a::b(t), clang-repl stops segfaulting. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75629 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits