Fznamznon wrote:
@mikaelholmen , thanks for the report. These warnings are kind of expected,
there is no big difference between `struct S1 s01 = { 1, {1} };` and `struct S1
s02 = { .d1.a = 1 };` in both cases field `b` of `d1` is not initialized. But
they are not expected for C, since we aim to silence missing field initializer
warning for designated initializers in C, just to match gcc behavior. It seems
the patch broke this "silencing" for nested designators, I'll try to provide
the fix shortly. If I'm not able, I'll revert.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70829
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
