topperc wrote: > > > @topperc If I am not mistaken Zicfiss extension uses moprr instructions > > > to get ROP functionality. But Zimop does not limit only the use of > > > Zicfiss extension. They can be redefined and assigned other operations. > > > > > > Right, but won't users be programming to each of the extensions that > > redefine them rather than some generic interface? We don't have > > builtins/intrinsics for all of the HINT encodings that can redefined. > > > > Yeah, I agree with you. > > But can be cases when someone in some narrow case needs to program logic by > hand. Why restrict it? > > I also think that a generic interface is much better than achieving the same > logic through builtins/intrinsics.
I just read back over my original question. I'm not sure it was clear that I was asking about the need for intrinsics. I don't object to assembler support and inline assembly is always an option. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75182 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
