jhuber6 wrote: > Perhaps we should consider prefixing it in some way (e.g. `hip-spirv` or > `amd-spirv`) that leaves the door open for some special handling (enable a > particular set of extensions only for amdgpu targeting SPIRV, try to deal > with missing builtins etc.) / flexibility?
Unsure that's necessary, as we'd already have `OFK_HIP` in the clang driver or `-x hip` in `cci` to key off of if needed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75357 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
